Dette er et seriøst spørsmål. Jeg banner sikkert i kirken nå, men vil ha en saklig diskusjon rundt dette. Hvorfor putte 15 000 i en bedre forsterker enn D3020, dersom man ikke har behov for å spille på høye volum?
Når jeg leser reviews som for eksempel NAD D 3020 integrated amplifier Sam Tellig | Stereophile.com virker det som denne forsterkeren virkelig er i stand til å drive både vanskelig- og lettdrevne høyttalere?
For eksempel skriver de; The D 3020's rated power output is 30Wpc into 8 ohms, but NAD claims that it can drive "difficult" speakers with relative aplomb. In other words, like the original 3020, the D 3020 should be difficult to blow up. It worked fine with the DeVore Fidelity Orangutan O/93s, and with my Harbeth M30.1s.
Jeg mener å huske at i gamle dager var det noen som fortalte meg at forsterker i hvert fall ikke skulle koste mindre enn høyttalerne, og høyttalerne han nevner er jo vesentlig dyrere i dette tilfellet?
I tillegg skrives det:
Right now, NAD's D 3020 is the best bargain in all of hi-fi.
Common sense will tell you not to use the D 3020 in a large room with insensitive, extremely "difficult" speakers. NAD has plenty of products that can handle that. In a pinch, though, the D 3020 could probably drive almost anything to moderate volume levels. I'd like to try it with, say, a $60,000 pair of speakers.Nah. Better yet, with a $1500 pair.
Yikes! Stephen was right.
It was Stephen Mejias who suggested I listen to NAD's D 3020 in the first place. He also suggested that I try it with my KEF LS50 monitors.
A splendid combination, said he.
Perfect. The NAD D 3020 was fully up to driving the KEFs in my listening room, and the bass boost warmed up their sound just right.
Stephen Mejias concluded his original review of the D 3020 by asking, "Will [the D 3020] be the component that introduces a new generation of music lovers to true high-fidelity sound?" I'd like to think that the answer to that question is "Yes!"—John Atkinson
Ønsker noen saklige svar rundt dette. Jeg stiller dette spørsmålet som nybegynner, så ikke slakt meg
Når jeg leser reviews som for eksempel NAD D 3020 integrated amplifier Sam Tellig | Stereophile.com virker det som denne forsterkeren virkelig er i stand til å drive både vanskelig- og lettdrevne høyttalere?
For eksempel skriver de; The D 3020's rated power output is 30Wpc into 8 ohms, but NAD claims that it can drive "difficult" speakers with relative aplomb. In other words, like the original 3020, the D 3020 should be difficult to blow up. It worked fine with the DeVore Fidelity Orangutan O/93s, and with my Harbeth M30.1s.
Jeg mener å huske at i gamle dager var det noen som fortalte meg at forsterker i hvert fall ikke skulle koste mindre enn høyttalerne, og høyttalerne han nevner er jo vesentlig dyrere i dette tilfellet?
I tillegg skrives det:
Right now, NAD's D 3020 is the best bargain in all of hi-fi.
Common sense will tell you not to use the D 3020 in a large room with insensitive, extremely "difficult" speakers. NAD has plenty of products that can handle that. In a pinch, though, the D 3020 could probably drive almost anything to moderate volume levels. I'd like to try it with, say, a $60,000 pair of speakers.Nah. Better yet, with a $1500 pair.
Yikes! Stephen was right.
It was Stephen Mejias who suggested I listen to NAD's D 3020 in the first place. He also suggested that I try it with my KEF LS50 monitors.
A splendid combination, said he.
Perfect. The NAD D 3020 was fully up to driving the KEFs in my listening room, and the bass boost warmed up their sound just right.
Stephen Mejias concluded his original review of the D 3020 by asking, "Will [the D 3020] be the component that introduces a new generation of music lovers to true high-fidelity sound?" I'd like to think that the answer to that question is "Yes!"—John Atkinson
Ønsker noen saklige svar rundt dette. Jeg stiller dette spørsmålet som nybegynner, så ikke slakt meg
Sist redigert: