|
Og dermed er vel egentlig utviklingsteorien bevist.Prest ble bitt av slange å nektet og motta hjelp(bare fra gud selvfølgelig) døde
Prest nektet å motta behandling for dødelig slangebitt - VG Nett om Dyrene
Anser at retten her har gjort knefall for fantasifosteret Allah. Det ville aldri blitt akseptert dersom dette var en utlegning av Ole Brumm. Dustedom, og en farlig sådan. Vi kan ikke under noen omstendighet tillate at fullstendig fornuftige mennesker knebles fordi de største psykopatene skal ha sin "ytringsfrihet". Dersom en utlegning av Ole Brumm eller Koranen innebærer åpenbare trusler, må vi gjøre noe med de religiøses åpenbare særrettigheter. Det er nok vrøvl nå.
Næmmen næ. en innrømmelse,ja ja en begynnelse i hvertall. Dette må jo nordmenn leve med dagelig.Anser at retten her har gjort knefall for fantasifosteret Allah.ærer åpenbare trusler, må vi gjøre noe med de religiøses åpenbare særrettigheter. Det er nok vrøvl nå.
Honkey
?? Har'u fått i deg noe du ikke har spist?Næmmen næ. en innrømmelse,ja ja en begynnelse i hvertall. Dette må jo nordmenn leve med dagelig.Anser at retten her har gjort knefall for fantasifosteret Allah.ærer åpenbare trusler, må vi gjøre noe med de religiøses åpenbare særrettigheter. Det er nok vrøvl nå.
Honkey
Vaffal de som er så uheldige å bo der dette er daglig standard.
ikke lat som du ikke skjønte det.?? Har'u fått i deg noe du ikke har spist?Næmmen næ. en innrømmelse,ja ja en begynnelse i hvertall. Dette må jo nordmenn leve med dagelig.Anser at retten her har gjort knefall for fantasifosteret Allah.ærer åpenbare trusler, må vi gjøre noe med de religiøses åpenbare særrettigheter. Det er nok vrøvl nå.
Honkey
Vaffal de som er så uheldige å bo der dette er daglig standard.
Hva forsøkte du egentlig å si her, Boffen?
Honkey
Beklager. Mulig jeg er treg, men nå ser jeg ikke helt hvor du vil hen.ikke lat som du ikke skjønte det.?? Har'u fått i deg noe du ikke har spist?Næmmen næ. en innrømmelse,ja ja en begynnelse i hvertall. Dette må jo nordmenn leve med dagelig.
Vaffal de som er så uheldige å bo der dette er daglig standard.
Hva forsøkte du egentlig å si her, Boffen?
Honkey
Mens du bruker nokså få ord på å si ingenting. Og jeg fatter fortsatt ikke en dritt!Ya, shure. du bruker mye ord på å få sagt farlig lite.
nb får dømme.
Tar på meg min fineste Brummka og bøyer knærne og hodet ydmykt mot Oleanna. Bøyer meg i skam og ruelse, synger "det snør, det snør, tiddelibum..." 100 ganger.Honken!!!
Nu er jeg sint på deg!! Dra en så enestående hverdagsfilosof som Ole Brum så langt ned at du sammenligner ham med Allah!!!! Du er en samvittighetsløs skurk når du gjør noe slikt!
Du skal være meget glad for at Ole er men meget fredelig fyr som ikke setter i verk fatwaer og slike ting!
Som autorisert "Brummist" og opphøyet yppersteprest i sekten har man det privilegium å skrive navnet med en "m"!![]()
Oh Depphy. That is a dare if I ever saw one...The greatest trick satan did was to tell people that he does not exist...
You can easily spot the ones who believe in that lie...
Vis vedlegget 244739
Ja det har politiet ressurser til, de har også ressurser til å storme videregående skole for å ta unger som selger eller bruker hasj. Samtidig står mange utenfor Oslo politikammer og selger langt sterkere stoffer.
Dette blir nok henlagt som mye annet, Oslopolitiet skal nå i gang med hatkrim satsing siden svenskene er så mye bedre på den biten.
Jepp det blir nok et skritt i riktig retning, la oss konkurrere med de sinnssykt PK svenskenevel vel folkens gjem godteri og barnebøker og heis for all del ikke flagget……
Klassekampen.no | Mer hatkrim i Sverige
Man kan også la fakler og vintertøy ligge det blir neppe skreket etter fakkeltog denne gang heller
Har du vært innom denne siden Deffe? http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.phpThe greatest trick satan did was to tell people that he does not exist...
You can easily spot the ones who believe in that lie...
Vis vedlegget 244739
Under Bondevik regjeringene var det vanlig at muslimer sa at de hadde konvertert til kristendommen eller at de var homofile får å få opphold.
Sam Harris har en god kommentar:When Muslim organizations invite Shaykhs who speak openly about the values of Islam, the Islamophobic western media starts murdering the character of that organization and the invited speaker. The question these Islamophobic journalists need to reflect upon is; are these so called ‘‘radical’’ views that they criticize endorsed only by these few individuals being invited around the globe, or does the common Muslims believe in them. If the common Muslims believe in these values that means that more or less all Muslims are radical and that Islam is a radical religion. Since this is not the case, as Islam is a peaceful religion and so are the masses of common Muslims, these Shaykhs cannot be radical. Rather it is Islamophobia from the ignorant western media who is more concerned about making money by alienating Islam by presenting Muslims in this way. Islam Net, an organization in Norway, invited 9 speakers to Peace Conference Scandinavia 2013.
These speakers would most likely be labelled as ‘‘extremists’’ if the media were to write about the conference. But how come this conference was the largest Islamic Scandinavian International event that has taken place in Norway with about 4000 people attending? Were the majority of those who attended in opposition to what the speakers were preaching? If so, how come they paid to enter? Let’s forget about that for a moment, let’s imagine that we don’t really knew what all these people thought about for example segregation of men and women, or stoning to death of those who commit adultery. The Chairman of Islam Net, Fahad Ullah Qureshi asked the audience, and the answer was clear. The attendees were common Sunni Muslims. They did not consider themselves as radicals or extremists. They believed that segregation was the right thing to do, both men and women agreed upon this. They even supported stoning or whatever punishment Islam or prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) commanded for adultery or any other crime. They even believed that these practises should be implemented around the world. Now what does that tell us? Either all Muslims and Islam is radical, or the media is Islamophobic and racist in their presentation of Islam. Islam is not radical, nor is Muslims in general radical. That means that the media is the reason for the hatred against Muslims, which is spreading among the non-Muslims in western countries.
Helt enig. Norge burde ikke gi en krone til regimer med sharialovgivning.^Veldig bra, om han nå også kunne manne seg opp til å gjøre det samme med Pakistan.
^^^ Svært interessant. Her er mer fra samme konferanse:
Et utdrag:
Sam Harris har en god kommentar:When Muslim organizations invite Shaykhs who speak openly about the values of Islam, the Islamophobic western media starts murdering the character of that organization and the invited speaker. The question these Islamophobic journalists need to reflect upon is; are these so called ‘‘radical’’ views that they criticize endorsed only by these few individuals being invited around the globe, or does the common Muslims believe in them. If the common Muslims believe in these values that means that more or less all Muslims are radical and that Islam is a radical religion. Since this is not the case, as Islam is a peaceful religion and so are the masses of common Muslims, these Shaykhs cannot be radical. Rather it is Islamophobia from the ignorant western media who is more concerned about making money by alienating Islam by presenting Muslims in this way. Islam Net, an organization in Norway, invited 9 speakers to Peace Conference Scandinavia 2013.
These speakers would most likely be labelled as ‘‘extremists’’ if the media were to write about the conference. But how come this conference was the largest Islamic Scandinavian International event that has taken place in Norway with about 4000 people attending? Were the majority of those who attended in opposition to what the speakers were preaching? If so, how come they paid to enter? Let’s forget about that for a moment, let’s imagine that we don’t really knew what all these people thought about for example segregation of men and women, or stoning to death of those who commit adultery. The Chairman of Islam Net, Fahad Ullah Qureshi asked the audience, and the answer was clear. The attendees were common Sunni Muslims. They did not consider themselves as radicals or extremists. They believed that segregation was the right thing to do, both men and women agreed upon this. They even supported stoning or whatever punishment Islam or prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) commanded for adultery or any other crime. They even believed that these practises should be implemented around the world. Now what does that tell us? Either all Muslims and Islam is radical, or the media is Islamophobic and racist in their presentation of Islam. Islam is not radical, nor is Muslims in general radical. That means that the media is the reason for the hatred against Muslims, which is spreading among the non-Muslims in western countries.
"This is a remarkable document. Read it closely, and you will pass through the looking glass. The organizers of this conference believe (with good reason) that “extremist” views are not rare among Muslims, even in the West. And they consider the media’s denial of this fact to be a symptom of… Islamophobia. The serpent of obscurantism has finally begun to devour its own tail. Apparently, it is a sign of racism to imagine that only a tiny minority of Muslims could actually condone the subjugation of women and the murder of apostates. How dare you call us “extremists” when we represent so many? We are not extreme. This is Islam. They have a point. And it is time for secular liberals and (truly) moderate Muslims to stop denying it."