bambadoo skrev:
Nå er det schaefer som topper statistikken. Golden retriever er oppe der også, det samme med noen polarhunder. Hvor Rottweiler er på lista er jeg usikker på. Det er også mange logiske grunner for at det nettopp er slik.
En ting er sikkert. Blir et barn bitt av en hund så står det:
"Gutt 8 bitt av Rottweiler" eller schaefer eller pitbull....
Gjelder det en annen rase står det:
"Gutt 8 bitt av hund"
Selv har jeg Riesenschnauzer som ikke er kjent for å bite folk, men de er store og kan virke skremmende på f.eks. innbruddstyver.
Det er jo vakthund og den har en vakthunds innstinkt inntakt.
Mange hunder han bite men noen av dem er livsfarlige. Rottweilere og Pit Buller står for majoriteten av angrep med fatale følger. Søk litt på "statistics dog bites" så finner du nok dokumentasjon på dette.
eksempel:
"The deadliest dogs
Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, has conducted an unusually detailed study of dog bites from 1982 to the present. (Clifton, Dog attack deaths and maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to November 13, 2006; click here to read it.) The Clifton study show the number of serious canine-inflicted injuries by breed. The author's observations about the breeds and generally how to deal with the dangerous dog problem are enlightening.
According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings.
In more than two-thirds of the cases included in the study, the life-threatening or fatal attack was apparently the first known dangerous behavior by the animal in question. Clifton states:
If almost any other dog has a bad moment, someone may get bitten, but will not be maimed for life or killed, and the actuarial risk is accordingly reasonable. If a pit bull terrier or a Rottweiler has a bad moment, often someone is maimed or killed--and that has now created off-the-chart actuarial risk, for which the dogs as well as their victims are paying the price.
Clifton's opinions are as interesting as his statistics. For example, he says, "Pit bulls and Rottweilers are accordingly dogs who not only must be handled with special precautions, but also must be regulated with special requirements appropriate to the risk they may pose to the public and other animals, if they are to be kept at all.""
http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statistics.html
Eller her:
From 1979 through 1996, dog attacks resulted in more than 300 human dog-bite related deaths in the United States. Most of the victims were children.
From 1979 through 1998, at least 25 breeds of dogs have been involved in 238 human dog bite related deaths. Pit Bulls and Rottweilers were involved in more than 50 percent of these deaths.
http://www.dogbitelegalcenter.com/resources/dogbite-statistics.html